           
 
|
EDITOR
Dr. Saiful I. Dildar
I.T. Manager
Md. Ruhul Amin
Assistance by :
The Institute of Rural Develoment-IRD
EDITORIAL OFFICE:
Bangladesh Human Rights Commission (BHRC)
222/Kha, Malibag (1st floor)
Fat # C-2, Dhaka-1217
G.P.O. Box- 3725, Bangladesh. Tel:
88-02-9361353, 01714098355
Fax: 88-02-9343501, 8321085
E-mail: hrm.news24@gmail.com
Website: www.bhrc-bd.org |
Editorial
‘Fortnightly’
পাক্ষিক
‘Manabadhikar’মানবাধিকার
২৪তম বর্ষ ৫৫১তম সংখ্যা ৩১ মে ২০১৫ইং |
অভিবাসীদের আগে জীবন বাঁচান
বাংলাদেশ ও মিয়ানমারের ছয় থেকে আট হাজার মানুষ
মালয়েশিয়া, থাইল্যান্ড ও ইন্দোনেশিয়ার
উপকূলসংলগ্ন সাগরে নৌকায় আটকা পড়ে আছে। তাদের
কেউ অভিবাসী বা আশ্রয় সুবিধা পেতে, কেউ বা
কাজের সন্ধানে গিয়েছিল। কিন্তু এই তিন দেশই
বিপদগ্রস্ত এসব মানুষকে বহনকারী নৌকাগুলো কূলে
ভিড়তে দিচ্ছে না। ইতিমধ্যেই অনেক অভিবাসীর
মৃত্যু ঘটেছে, মুমূর্ষু অবস্থায় আছে আরো অনেকে।
সমস্যাটি সমাধানের পন্থা নিয়ে গার্ডিয়ানকে
কয়েকজন বিশেষজ্ঞ যে মত দেন তা তুলে ধরা হচ্ছে।
লিলিয়ান ফ্যান (লিলিয়ান এশিয়ার মানবিক ও
সংঘাতবিষয়ক ইস্যুগুলোর ব্যাংককভিত্তিক
বিশেষজ্ঞ এবং যুক্তরাজ্যের ওভারসিজ
ডেভেলপমেন্ট ইনস্টিটিউটের গবেষণাকাজের সঙ্গে
জড়িত) : ‘আর কোনো মৃত্যু আমরা চাই না।
মালয়েশিয়া, থাইল্যান্ড ও ইন্দোনেশিয়া- তিন
দেশকেই বিষয়টিকে মানবিকভাবে দেখতে হবে, খুঁজে
বের করতে তাৎক্ষণিক কোনো সমাধান। আঞ্চলিকভাবে
সমাধান সন্ধান তো করতেই হবে, সেই সঙ্গে
মিয়ানমারের সঙ্গেও কার্যকর আলোচনা চালাতে হবে।
রাখাইন প্রদেশ থেকে আর কোনো রোহিঙ্গাকে বিতাড়ন
করা হবে না- এই নিশ্চয়তা মিয়ানমারকে দিতে হবে।
সমস্যাটি আসলে দেশহীনতার, নাগরিকত্ব লাভের। তবে
আসিয়ানের (অ্যাসোসিয়েশন অব সাউথইস্ট এশিয়ান
নেশনস) উচিত হবে না এখনই মিয়ানমারকে
নাগরিকত্বের বিষয়টি নিয়ে কঠোরভাবে চাপ দেওয়া।
আপাতত মানবিকতার দিকটি যাতে সুরক্ষিত হয় সে
চেষ্টাটি শুরু করতে হবে। কারণ নাগরিকত্ব
জটিলতার সমাধান একটি দীর্ঘসূত্রতার বিষয়।
জরুরিভিত্তিক তাৎক্ষণিক সমাধানের মধ্যে আছে
মালয়েশিয়া, থাইল্যান্ড ও ইন্দোনেশিয়ায়
আশ্রয়কেন্দ্র খোলা। একেক দেশ তাদের মতো করে
হয়তো বিষয়টির সামাল দেবে; সমাধান কৌশলও হয়তো
অভিন্ন হবে না, কিন্তু সার্বিক সমন্বয়টা যেন
থাকে। যেমন বাংলাদেশ থেকে আসা ব্যক্তিরা
স্থায়ীভাবে থাকতে নয়, কাজের সন্ধানে এসেছে।
তাই তাদের ক্ষেত্রে ব্যবস্থাপনাটাও হতে হবে
ভিন্ন।
এই অঞ্চলের সব দেশকে আর যা করতে হবে তা হচ্ছে
সমস্যার গভীরে প্রবেশ। এখন এক দেশ আরেক দেশের
সঙ্গে মানবপাচার বিষয়ে কিছু কিছু তথ্য শুধু
বিনিময় করছে; কিন্তু ভূমিকাটা হওয়া উচিত আরো
বিশদ। যোগাযোগব্যবস্থা, নিয়ন্ত্রণকেন্দ্র, যৌথ
টহলব্যবস্থা, তথ্যবিনিময় সুবিধা- সব কিছুরই
প্রয়োজন রয়েছে আমাদের।
|
Top
BHRC Human Rights Report
Total 256 persons killed
in May,
2015
The documentation section of Bangladesh Human Rights
Commission (BHRC) furnished this human rights survey
report on the basis of daily newspapers and
information received from its district, sub-district
and municipal branches. As per survey it appears
that 256 peoples were killed in May, 2015 in all
over the country. It proves that the law and order
situation is not satisfactory. Bangladesh Human
Rights Commissions extremely anxious about this
situation. In the month of May, 2015 average 8
people were killed in each day.
The Law enforcing agencies and related Govt.
departments should be more responsible so that
percentage of killing may be brought down to zero
level. To institutionalize the democracy and to
build human rights based society the rule of law and
order must be established everywhere. Through
enforcing rule of law only such violation against
human rights can be minimized.
It appears from documentation division of BHRC:
Total 256 persons killed in May 2015
Political killing 8, Killing for dowry 9, killing by
family violence 49, Killed due to social discrepancy
45, Killed by Law enforcing authority 11, Killed due
to doctor negligence 4, Assassination 7, H.
Mysterious death 97, Killed due to BSF 6, Women &
chilled killed due to rape 7, Killed by Acid throw
4, Killed after Abduction 9.
Killed by several accidents: Killed by road accident
247, Suicide 38
Besides victims of torture:
Rape 40, Torture for Dowry 7, Sexual Harassment 6,
Journalist torture 2, Acid throwing 5.
Top
PM stresses North-South coop for progress

Human Rights Report:
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina on Sunday underscored
the need for increased cooperation among the
countries both in the South and the North in various
areas of development as the South alone cannot make
progress."The South cannot make progress alone while
they have significant barriers like resource
scarcity, low technical expertise, inadequate
infrastructure, institutional incapacity, weak
financial management system, non-functional legal
and regulatory framework and internal strife. So,
cooperation of the North can remove many of these
barriers," she said.The Prime Minister was speaking
at a two-day high-level meeting on 'South-South and
Triangular Cooperation in the Post-2015 Development
Agenda: Financing for Development in the South and
Technology Transfer' at Sonargaon Hotel.The Prime
Minister further said, "Cooperation among the
Southern countries especially in trade, food
security, higher education, skill development,
healthcare, conservation of natural resources,
renewable energy, foreign direct investment, capital
market development, creating global public goods and
scientific research and development is urgently
needed."Laying emphasis on finding ways for
financing development activities by the Southern
countries, Sheikh Hasina also called on the
developed countries not to replace the official
development assistance which the North is committed
to proving under internationally agreed decision.In
this connection, she mentioned that centres of
excellence established in different southern
countries for research and development purposes
which may play a vital role in qualitative expansion
of the South-South cooperation. "Development
solutions and knowledge being generated by the
centers of excellence should be affordable and made
available to share and replicate," Hasina said
adding that development solutions can be customised
to country-specific needs and situation. She said,
the critical advanced knowledge and enhanced
capacity which are much needed by the southern
institutions or centers of excellence could be
provided under Triangular cooperation.AK Abdul Momen,
President of the General Assembly High-Level
Committee on South-South Cooperation and Permanent
Representative of Bangladesh to the United Nations,
Jeremiah Nyamane Kingsley Mamabolo, Permanent
Representative of the Republic of South Africa to
the United Nations, George Wilfred Talbot, Permanent
Representative of Guyana to the United Nations,
Yiping Zhou, Envoy of the Secretary-General on
South-South Cooperation, Director of the United
Nations Office on South-South Cooperation and
Rintaro Tamaki, Deputy Secretary-General,
Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) also spoke at the inaugural
session..
Mamata to visit Dhaka June 5
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on
Saturday said she would visit Bangladesh on June 5
and return home on June 6 after the signing of the
Land Boundary Agreement.
The tour plan indicates that she would be visiting
Bangladesh separately as Indian Prime Minister
Narendra Modi is scheduled to arrive here on June 6.
On May 28, the state's Education and Parliamentary
Affairs Minister, Partha Chatterjee, first broke the
news that Mamata would accompany Prime Minister
Narendra Modi on his Dhaka trip, according to Indian
media outlet DNA.
"I will be reaching Bangladesh on June 5 and will be
back on June 6 after the signing of the Land
Boundary Agreement," Banerjee told reporters at the
state secretariat in Kolkata.
Parliament had recently passed the constitution
amendment bill seeking to settle India's 41-year-old
border issue with Bangladesh.
The legislation would operationalise the 1974
India-Bangladesh Land Boundary agreement that
provides for exchange of 161 enclaves adversely held
by the the two countries..
Top
51 traffickers
held in Thailand
Arrest warrants have been issued for
four more suspects allegedly involved in trafficking
of migrants from Myanmar and Bangladesh, Thailand
police said on Saturday, reported Thai media.
Thai police said the four new arrest warrants
brought the total to 81. Some 51 suspects have been
arrested, while 30 were still at large.
He said police were hunting the remaining suspects
in Songkhla, Satun and Ranong.
On Saturday brought 12 Rohingya migrants to identify
sites believed to be camps where they were detained
and asked to identify which suspects manned the
camps where they were held.
The police also took pictures of various camps to
show to some suspects who confessed to human
trafficking charges, to identify which camp they
worked at.
Songkhla provincial police deputy chief Pol Col
Treewit Sripapa said 12 Rohingya migrants were
brought to Glass Mountain in Songkhla's Sadao
district.
He said the migrants remembered the route and led
police to their camps. They told police details
about each camp.
Meanwhile, a Thai national who allegedly owned a
boat recently found by the Myanmar navy crammed with
more than 200 migrants has been arrested, Myanmar's
state media said yesterday.
The 53-year-old man was detained in the country's
biggest city, Yangon, the Global New Light of
Myanmar reported, adding that his capture was made
after authorities exchanged 'information with Thai
police'.
The paper said the man operated under a handful of
Myanmar aliases, but his Thai name was Naingnut
Patunsantun and he came from Ranong province in
Thailand.
'He was said to have contacted human trafficking
gangs in Bangladesh and trafficked people into
Thailand and Malaysia,' the report said.
The report did not say when the arrest was made or
what the man was charged with.
Last week Myanmar's navy discovered more than 200
bare-chested men in the hull of a wooden,
Thai-registered fishing vessel. It was the first
rescue the navy made since Myanmar came under
increasing pressure to stem the exodus of persecuted
Rohingya Muslims from its shores after a Thai
crackdown on the lucrative regional smuggling trade
left thousands of desperate migrants stranded on
land and sea after gangs abandoned them.
Thousands of Rohingya from Myanmar as well as
Bangladeshi economic migrants have been attempting
perilous boat journeys organised by people-smugglers
to Southeast Asia.
Malaysia is a favourite destination. Migrants often
travelled to Thailand by boat, then overland to
northern Malaysia.
On 29 May, a second vessel with more than 700
migrants was found by Myanmar's navy in the
Irrawaddy delta region.
.
Top
A promise whose
time has come
Barrister Harun ur
Rashid
India fulfilled one
promise with regard to the Land Boundary Agreement
and hopefully the Teesta Water Agreement will
follow. The implementation of the two Agreements are
very important for Bangladesh people to measure up
India's obligations toward Bangladesh since 2011.
Bangladesh is indeed very happy that the Modi
government fulfilled one promise and after the
passage of the constitution amendment bill through
both Houses of parliament on 6th and 7th May, Prime
Minister Modi telephoned his counterpart in
Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina and reportedly both
congratulated each other.
Bangladesh hopes other legal formalities for
ratification of the constitutional amendment bill
will be completed in India and both countries may
take actions to put into operation the agreement on
the ground.
The map we know and draw for Bangladesh after 43
years is territorially complete because there would
no more Indian enclaves inside Bangladesh. The other
impact will be that the misery and distress of the
inhabitants in the enclaves will be over and that
was why the inhabitants living in Indian enclaves in
Bangladesh were overjoyed at the news and
distributed sweets among themselves.
Indira-Mujib Agreement of 1974
It is noted that the Indo-Bangladesh land border
runs about 4096.70 kilometres. Out of which 2216 km
with West Bengal, with Tripura, 865 km, with
Meghalaya 443 km, with Mizoram 318 km and with Assam
263 km. Some of the borders remain un-demarcated and
disputed from Pakistan days, and even after
Bangladesh became an independent and sovereign
state.
After independence, Bangladesh sought to demarcate a
fresh boundary with India in all sectors.
Accordingly the Indira-Mujib Land Boundary Agreement
was signed in 1974 which envisages the following:
" 6.5 kilometres need to be demarcated. in Assam,
Tripura, West Bengal sectors
" Exchange of adverse possession
" Exchange of enclaves in each other's territory
India adversely possesses 2,267. 682 acres of
Bangladesh land at eighteen places. On the other
hand, Bangladesh adversely possesses 2,777. 038
acres of India's land at seven places.
There are 111 Indian enclaves with 17,158 acres and
a population of 37, 369 inside Bangladesh and there
are 51 enclaves with 7,110 acres and a population of
14,215 in India.
Although Bangladesh had ratified it in 1974, India
could not ratify the agreement for variety of
reasons including the fact that unless border is
demarcated, the LBA cannot be implemented. It is
reported that when the 1974 land agreement was
concluded this issue was not raised and Bangladesh
felt very disappointed for its non-implementation.
Vindication for AL
The LBA remained unresolved until the Hasina
government in 2010 injected a new paradigm in
bilateral relations with India and the Joint
Communique issued after a summit speaks of the
commitment of the two countries to solve all issues
through cooperation and mutual understanding.
Given the state of mutually cooperative relations,
the Protocol to the 1974 Land Boundary Agreement (LBA)
was concluded between former PM Manmohan Singh with
his Bangladesh counterpart Sheikh Hasina in 2011
during his visit to Bangladesh in September of that
year.
The Manmohan Singh government could not implement it
because of the opposition of BJP and Trinamool
Congress of Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal. However
the constitution amendment bill was kept alive by
the Singh government in the Upper House of Indian
parliament so that the successor Indian government
would be able to take appropriate action.
BJP government
After the BJP government led by Narendra Modi came
to power, he assured Bangladesh that both the sticky
issues-namely Teesta Water Agreement and the LBA
would be resolved. The Modi government is aware that
the Hasina government had moved quickly to address
Delhi's concerns on cross-border terrorism
(including expelling top ULFA insurgents to India)
and connectivity to the North-East.
During home secretary-level talks between India and
Bangladesh in February India's home secretary
reportedly told his Bangladeshi counterpart that
with the parliamentary standing committee on home
affairs having unanimously approved the Constitution
(119th Amendment) Bill, 2013, the way had been paved
for its consideration and passage by Parliament.
Though the BJP and Trinamool Congress were earlier
opposed to the bill, they shed their reservations
and supported it during deliberations of the
standing committee of the parliament.
In recent days BJP Assam, the All Assam Students
Union (AASU), and Assam Gono Parishad (AGP) have
been opposing the LBA in Assam sector on the ground
that Bangladesh will get lands from Assam. The claim
has been rebutted by the Assam Chief Minister Tarun
Gogoi who reportedly said that according to records
available with the Assam government, the land-pact
would provide Assam with 1,240 acres of disputed
border land while Bangladesh would get only 357.4
acres. Gogoi wrote a letter to the Prime Minister
Modi explaining the advantages of Assam out of the
LBA.
The Modi government had earlier proposed to bring
the bill by keeping Assam out of its purview but
faced stiff resistance from the main opposition
Congress party which wanted territories in Assam to
be included.
It is reported that Congress on 30th April conveyed
to the government that it would oppose the bill
unless Assam is included. "This is weird that even
as the government of the state is in favour of the
agreement, it is being kept out because the
opposition party (BJP) in Assam does not want it," a
senior Congress functionary said.
The Congress has more seats in the Upper House than
those of BJP. The Congress Party has 68 seats, more
than the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance's
strength of 59. Currently, the Opposition has a
combined strength of at least 132 in an effective
House of 243 members.
It is reported that senior leaders like External
Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj and Home Minister
Rajnath Singh explained the 'urgent necessity' to
clear the bill in the interest of 'India's prestige'
as the issue of exchanging enclaves has been hanging
since the 1974 Indira-Mujib pact.
They also pointed out the need to maintain good
relations with a friendly government in Bangladesh,
which would stand severely embarrassed, if the bill
was not passed in original form.
Once India goes through the ratification process of
the Constitution amendment bill , the implementation
of LBA will start by Bangladesh and India. It is
learnt that the inhabitants in the enclaves will be
given a choice either to be Indian or Bangladesh
citizens. If the same does not happen, the life of
these people shall continue to be as troubled as it
was in the past.
Behind the scene, another factor that has
contributed to the adoption of the bill in both
houses of parliament is that Modi sought to prove
that he has been a strong leader and he kept his
promise to Bangladesh.
One immediate effect is that it will facilitate the
proposed visit of Prime Minister Modi in June or
July to Bangladesh despite the unresolved Teesta
Water Sharing Agreement between the two countries.
Modi can show that he has not come to Bangladesh
with empty hands. And he delivered to Bangladesh
what he promised. During his visit, many bilateral
agreements including agreement on coastal shipping
to allow river vessels to carry cargo between the
two countries would be signed. Prime Minister Modi's
visit and the conclusion of LBA will not only boost
Bangladesh-India relations but also will demonstrate
that the Hasina government was able to resolve the
territorial swap. The Hasina government's friendly
policy toward India is thus justified in the eyes of
Bangladesh people.
Barrister Harun ur Rashid, Former Bangladesh
Ambassador to the UN, Geneva.
Top
BD-Malaysia to back
move for ending crisis
Bangladesh and Malaysia have agreed on continued
cooperation with other countries in the region,
seeking a resolution to a deepening crisis in which
boatloads of migrants are stranded off Southeast
Asia's shores, with no country willing to take them
in.The agreement came at the fourth meeting of the
Malaysia-Bangladesh Joint Commission held in Kota
Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia on Sunday, ahead of
meetings scheduled meetings with Indonesian and Thai
foreign ministers in the coming days.Foreign
Minister A H Mahmood Ali and his Malaysian
counterpart Dato' Sri Anifah Aman led their
respective sides in the meeting which was preceded
by a senior officials' meeting held yesterday.Both
the Foreign Ministers agreed to further explore the
potentials of bilateral trade and investment,
according to a message received here from
Malaysia.During the meeting, Dhaka requested Kuala
Lumpur to take further steps to recruit more workers
from Bangladesh and consider opening other potential
sectors for Bangladesh workers.Malaysia also
launched a series of high-level talks with its
neighbors Sunday, seeking a solution to a deepening
crisis in which boatloads of refugees are stranded
off Southeast Asia's shores.The Malaysian foreign
minister will meet with his Indonesian counterpart
today (Monday) and Thailand counterpart on Wednesday
to discuss on the immigrant boatmen issue, according
to New Straits Time Online report. Boatloads of more
than 2,000 members of Myanmar's ethnic Rohingya
Muslim community fleeing persecution and migrants
from Bangladesh trying to escape poverty have landed
in Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand in recent
weeks.But, thousands more are stranded at sea after
a crackdown on human traffickers prompted captains
and smugglers to abandon their human
cargo.Expressing satisfaction over the current state
of bilateral relations, the both sides hoped that
regular exchange of visits and interaction between
leaders and officials would continue to be the
driving force behind the development of productive
and mutually beneficial relations between the two
countries.During the meeting, whole gamut of
bilateral issues were discussed when both sides
agreed to explore the option to use existing
platforms such as Malaysia South-South Association (MASSA)
and Bangladesh-Malaysia Chamber of Commerce and
Industry (BMCCI) to organize the Bangladesh-Malaysia
Investment Forum.Both sides agreed to establish
institutional cooperation mechanism between the
Malaysian Meteorological Department (MMD) and the
Bangladesh Meteorological Department (BMD) to
promote the exchange of seismic measurement data in
real time and sharing of knowledge, experience and
good practices on tropical meteorology.The two sides
resolved to conduct the Joint Commission meeting on
bi-annual basis in strengthening bilateral relations
and agreed to establish Foreign Office Consultations
(FOC) between the two foreign ministries to further
strengthen and consolidate the existing relations.
Malaysia is the current chair of the 10-nation
Association of Southeast Asian Nations, which has
been criticized for long ignoring the plight of the
ethnic Rohingya.ASEAN adheres to a strict policy of
non-interference, which in the past has blocked
public criticism of Myanmar and critics say enables
member states to commit abuses without
consequences.After the 4th Joint Commission meeting
between Malaysia and Bangladesh Anifah said Malaysia
as ASEAN chairman is still seeking out a date to sit
with Myanmar foreign minister before deciding on
other steps like bringing the matter to the
international level or holding an emergency meeting.
"We are now finding a solution to the problem and
currently is giving humanitarian assistance, among
others... but I have already stated that we cannot
afford to accept more (of the arrival) of them as a
huge number already existed here and so far no
countries wants to settle them," he said. Anifah
said so this burden should not be carried by
Malaysia alone and we are asking Myanmar to
participate in finding a solution. "We try to help
them (refugees) as best as we can but at the same
time there are people complaining why there was an
influx of illegal immigrants in our shores," said
the Malaysian foreign minister. "We have to look at
our own interests too, our social problems and
security problems, we have to take that into
consideration," he reasoned. On the meeting with his
Bangladeshi counterpart, Anifah said he was briefed
that based on history, Bangladesh has never
considered Rohingya community from the Rakhine state
as their citizens. He said the massive number of
illegal immigrants that landed in Langkawi recently
has yet to be ascertained on their nationality, but
Abul Hassan has assured Bangladesh is willing to
cooperate with Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand on
this issue..
Top
Where we bury our
humanity
The crisis of the so-called "boat
people" has given the lie to our humanity in the
most disconcerting fashion. Its intersections of
harsh truths and savage betrayals jaw with the
comfortable space to which we had confined our
collective conscience, it gnaws at the sensibilities
bestowed on us by a so-called "civilisation". If it
doesn't, it should.
Consider it for a moment: people being turned back
to sea. To dead. People. To the great blue sea, in
overcrowded, rickety boats. "Sorry," we're saying.
"Can't take you in. No, not even to save your lives.
We know you have nowhere to go to. No, it's not that
there's no room. But things get complicated with you
lot later on. You carry a lot of baggage (ironic
chuckle). Better you die today. Find yourself a
watery grave. Make yourself useful." That
essentially, was the position taken by a number of
countries from Europe to Australia, including our
own, before things came to a head at the start of
May, with the grisly discovery of mass graves in the
Thai jungle, and even after that for a period.
Malaysia and Indonesia turned back at least two
boats in the days following the discovery, before
international condemnation forced them to reverse
that policy. We know back in 2012, the Bangladesh
government did the same to boatloads of the
Rohingyas fleeing persecution in Myanmar, where the
government's entire project of opening up to the
world after decades of insolence has been sorely
blighted by the inhuman treatment to which they
subject their Muslim population, comprised almost
entirely of the Rohingyas.
For things to come to such a pass is undoubtedly a
ringing indictment of the misplaced sense of purpose
that imbues the authorities in each of these
nations. And yet, when it comes to xenophobia, it
would seem they are not alone. Lest we forget, in
the days leading up to the crackdown on human
trafficking in Thailand, it was Europe that was
grappling with the same crisis, just featuring a
different set of characters. Whereas in Asia the
hapless victims happen to be the Rohingyas fleeing
the persecution in Myanmar along with some
Bangladeshis chasing a better life in
Muslim-majority Malaysia, those found drifting in
the Mediterranean Sea that stretches between Europe
and Asia and Africa, were almost all driven to their
fate by the war and conflict that now rages across
the Arab world, particularly Libya and Syria. After
an estimated 10,000 would-be migrants drowned trying
to reach the Old Continent, the European Commission
belatedly managed a response to salvage their
morality, if only for future reference. But only
just. As The Economist has reported, the EC's scheme
to resettle some 20,000 refugees from 'third
countries' (our penchant for erecting walls is
stupendous, really), when millions are languishing
in Turkish and Lebanese camps, is doomed to fail as
an alternative to "boats in the Mediterranean".
If not on numbers, the European plan, unveiled on
May 13 as a collective "agenda on migration", does
well on some other counts though. For example, it
promises technical assistance to "front-line"
countries like Italy, Malta and Greece, whose
territory the "boat people" first drift into. The
plan also aims to improve the EU's "dismal" return
rate for failed asylum-seekers. It also calls for
the relocation of most asylum-seekers who reach the
EU, the purpose here being to spread out the burden
of processing them. A country-by-country allocation
will be determined by what is being termed a
"distribution key" (by now, you'd be excused for
forgetting we're actually talking about human beings
here), based on the potential host country's
population, economic strength, and number of
refugees already present in them.
On the day Dhaka Courier hits the stands this week,
it will be the turn of the countries of Asia to
stitch together what their response is going to be
to the tragedy unfolding in their waters. Naturally,
the lack of a similar level of political and
administrative integration, as there is in Europe,
may be expected to produce a scheme that pales in
comparison to the one produced in Brussels. There
will be all sorts of teething problems. But at least
they are coming together, for a regional meeting on
"Irregular Migration in the Indian Ocean", convened
by the Thai government. The May 29 meeting is to be
attended by representatives of some 15 different
entities, including Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam,
Australia, the United States-which has called for
cooperation to address the migrants' plight-the
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, and
the International Organization for Migration (IOM),
in addition to Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia,
Myanmar and Bangladesh.
It comes at a time when some 8,000 people are said
to be adrift off the coasts of Thailand, Indonesia
and Malaysia, by the IOM. The UN meanwhile, reckons
at least 300 people died in the first three months
of the year off these boats. "The increasing
complexity of the problem demands a multi-faceted
approach," a Thai foreign ministry statement was
reported as saying. "Countries of origin, transit,
and destination must work together to address the
problem comprehensively." It remains to be seen what
the great and the good gathered in the Thai capital
this week manage to conjure up. Already though, the
scope of the crisis in Asia is made harder by a
number of factors. On top of the list by a distance
is a form of denialism afflicting two of the
governments that ordinarily should be most concerned
by the present state of affairs: Myanmar and
Bangladesh. The Bangladesh government continues to
follow an economic policy that marginalises those at
the very bottom of the pyramid (they might as well
be bricks). The Bangladesh prime minister is having
none of it of course, lashing out at the poor souls
for seeking a better life abroad, out of places
where 6 percent growth in GDP doesn't quite trickle
down as yet. There is also the racket of human
traffickers, who are said to keep people in the
administration all the way up to the top in their
good graces. The response here needs to be along the
lines of law-and-order, and targeted from an
economic point of view.
Top
Glorifying
Mahathirism
Mahfuzur Rahman
At least 52 countries in the world are regarded as
flawed democracies. The great Malaysia of Mahathir
bin Mohammad is one of them though he is credited
for transforming his country from a small rubber
exporter to one of Asia's 'tiger economies'. As
expected, the Economist Intelligence Unit's (EIU)
Democracy Index, which measures the state of
democracy around the world, in its 2014 report,
branded Malaysia as a 'flawed democracy', ranking it
65 out of 167 countries.
The EIU defines flawed democracies as countries that
have significant weaknesses in infringements on
media freedom, problems in governance, an
underdeveloped political culture and low levels of
political participation despite having free and fair
elections and respects for basic freedoms. It is a
question of the system, as well as part of political
ethics.
Though Malaysia holds elections regularly, critics
feel the polls are not fair and allege that
manipulation of electoral rolls and election
boundaries are what has kept the ruling coalition,
Barisan Nasional, in power since Malaya's
independence in 1957.
While transforming his country during his 22 years
in office as the Malaysian Prime Minister, Mahathir,
a single-minded leader, had resorted to
authoritarian stance against those who tried to
oppose him or threaten his power. Even then he had
to go.
During his rule, Mahathir had always used his
speeches to shock and stir audiences-whether it was
lambasting the Western world, carping at market
forces or rousing the party faithful out of apathy.
He announced his resignation on June 22, 2002 in a
speech before his United Malays National
Organization (UMNO) in a rhetorical flourish -
weeping. Naturally! Who does actually want to say
goodbye.
To screams of "why, why" from the delegates, a
sobbing Mahathir was quickly surrounded by senior
UMNO officials. He could be heard saying, "No, I've
decided. I've decided," as he was shunted out of the
hall. Mahathir critics found it as nothing but a
melodrama as he sensed that his time was over. But,
Mahathir's autocratic rule as UMNO leader and prime
minister means that a simple announcement about a
change of leadership is not possible.
Mahathir who had been at the helm of his country's
politics for over two decades, finally retired in
October, 2003 claiming to have left behind a 'great'
legacy. Thirteen years after his retirement, his
excesses have come back to wallop the world with a
backlash stronger than his modernisation's pace. A
democratic nation deserves to know the asset
accounts of its leaders. Mahathir was learned to
have never declared his assets. Malaysians still do
not know how he bought a nice home in the Mine.
In 1998-1999, Mahathir sacked his deputy Anwar
Ibrahim following sharp disputes over the direction
of economic policy during the Asian financial
crisis. He expelled Anwar and his supporters from
UMNO. When Anwar began organising opposition
rallies, he was arrested on charges of sodomy and
corruption. His chosen successor now languishes in
jail.
Top
.
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
|
|